[Hanna Sniper]

Quick Question

I've been out of the wrestling world since the Hart injury, I stopped watching WWF when he went to WCW and stopped watching wrestling all together once he retired. For kicks I tuned in once word spread that Bret signed a short term contract. So this is pretty much all new people since the days when I watched

My question is with the Triple H vs. Sheamus,
Normally you would think a new guy like Sheamus being a heel would beat down on HHH for 12 minutes to make himself look decent and gain some reputation then have HHH pull out a victory out of nowhere so everyone wins... fans happy, HHH wins, Sheamus gains some respect

But I really don't see HHH as a solid wrestler that can make another wrestler look good, looks like crap when he wrestles and is a gimmicky like Hogan with 3 or 4 moves that don't even look good.

This is the reason I picked Sheamus, as i don't see any other way coming out of this match that he gets any push other then getting the victory.

Am I wrong about HHH, I've always though he was a "business" wrestler first and does whats best for the company but when I see him wrestle I find it hard to believe. Can Sheamus walk away from this with a lose without being thrown to the wolves and pushed aside?