So here's an ethical question:
We all know that it's generally a mistake to negotiate with terrorists and give in to their demands. It tends to encourage further terrorism, as we've seen from companies and governments caving to hostage-takers in Iraq. But in a case like this, do you put those principles aside to try to save the lives of these children, even if it means granting concessions to the terrorists? On the one hand, letting so many innocent people die because you're sticking to your principles seems very arrogant. On the other hand, caving increases the likelihood that others will attempt attacks like this in the future.
|