03-10-2010, 09:22 AM
|
#4
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamingStuffedTiger
If I'm not mistaken, I think that 2004 ruling was set aside in the subsequent appeal...
|
Nope
Quote:
The judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal was delivered 19 May 2005, at Toronto, Ontario.
Justice Sexton, for the court, upheld the core finding of the previous case, that the identities should not be revealed to the plaintiffs. He found that merely placing files in a shared directory does not constitute the "authorization" needed to infringe on the distribution right.
|
|
|
|