Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post

burnin_vernon · 03-07-2010, 08:18 AM

I don't know if this is a Star Trek thread now but as someone who has never seen a second of any Star Trek history whatsoever, I thought that the character development was very interesting. Wasn't Spock's struggle with emotions as a character whose entire life was based on logic an example of a dynamic character?

The same could be said for Kirk, albeit on a less dramatic scale.

While several movies (like the Godfather) feature more in-depth character development, to mention Star Trek's lack of it in the same breath as Transformers 2 is ridiculous.

I don't care if movies have special effects at all, but just because they do doesn't mean they can't have intricate plots and characters as well.

03-07-2010, 08:18 AM	#25
burnin_vernon Powerplay Quarterback Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Vancouver Exp:	I don't know if this is a Star Trek thread now but as someone who has never seen a second of any Star Trek history whatsoever, I thought that the character development was very interesting. Wasn't Spock's struggle with emotions as a character whose entire life was based on logic an example of a dynamic character? The same could be said for Kirk, albeit on a less dramatic scale. While several movies (like the Godfather) feature more in-depth character development, to mention Star Trek's lack of it in the same breath as Transformers 2 is ridiculous. I don't care if movies have special effects at all, but just because they do doesn't mean they can't have intricate plots and characters as well.