Quote:
Originally posted by fotze+Sep 8 2005, 08:50 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (fotze @ Sep 8 2005, 08:50 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by RougeUnderoos@Sep 8 2005, 08:38 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Mean Mr. Mustard@Sep 8 2005, 05:09 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Flaming Homer
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
@Sep 8 2005, 05:06 PM
I love my dog too much, I would rescue her over anything excludng family members, it's a dog eat dog (pardon the pun) world out there and my family comes first to me, after that I'll worry about you, and that's just the way I see things.
|
So what if someone else was put in a situation where they could either rescue their pet or they could rescue your mother or your sister - or anyone you care about. You wouldn't have any problem with them rescuing their pet and leaving your loved ones to die. Sorry but that is pretty messed up in my mind.
|
Exactly.
That is what you are saying Homer -- that if someone chose their dog over your mother or sister, then that's fine.
Frankly speaking, if someone let my child or best friend or brother die in order to save their dog, I'd probably kill the dog just out of spite.
Seriously people, could you really live the rest of your life knowing you let a human being die so you could have a few more years with your dog?
|
Well this is ridiculous but if you killed my dog cause some guy chose to save my dog over your loved one, I would probably kill you family out of spite. Which is ridiculous, at least kill the guy who made the dumb decision not the goofy dog who knows no better.
But I would save the person, but I would sure give consideraion on how to save the dog as well. [/b][/quote]
Well sure it's ridiculous, but if the fantastic scenario came about where some stranger saved his effing poodle over someone I loved then I wouldn't be happy.
If it was some random guy who saved some random dog over a person I care about then it's the guy I'm "unhappy" with, not the random dog.