Quote:
Originally posted by Ozymandias+Aug 31 2004, 07:32 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Ozymandias @ Aug 31 2004, 07:32 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-TheCommodoreAfro@Aug 31 2004, 07:26 PM
Oh my god! Look at the title. Just how the heck can you read such one sided tripe? Whatever happened to balance and neutrality?
|
As I stated earlier, I'm disappointed to see more media attention on democrats and liberals, and not enough on conservatives and republicans. This isn't an indication of my political stance, but rather an indication of, hence, a lack of balance between both sides of the debate. [/b][/quote]
YAY! This is fun...
I enjoy Bull and I enjoy sh*t. And this encompasses both quite expertly. I watch the news regularly and if Kerry gets anymore time on air its because he is the challenger and it is only natural to focus more on the challenger. The media knows less about him, all he is doing is campaigning etc.
So for a fairer look one must go back to the 2000 election. Where had much more airtime than Gore. I know thats not completely fair but its closer to the truth. Which is that the cable media has a slight right wing balance because that what brings in the ratings. Why else would CNBC have Dennis Miller?