Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Tallent
Watts was never mentioned personally in the article yet he's taking it personally?
Why does he get to do a drive-by on the scientific profession on a regular basis, but if it gets turned around on him it's 'slimy'?
A noted sceptic blog versus one of the world's most respected and more objective papers (being owned by a charitable trust instead of a billionaire with an agenda). Yeaaaahhh.
|
Do you look anything up? Read a bit about the author of the article in your most respected and objective paper and tell me he isn't biased. Yeaaaahhh.
Note: from the category of "things that make you go 'hmmmmm'", the article written by Jeffrey Sachs was for Project Syndicate (global not-for-profit editorial writing organization.) When I looked up information on Project Syndicate, I got this link:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...ject_Syndicate. The 'hmmmmm' moment was when I got to the very bottom and saw the sole entry under "Related SourceWatch Articles." Maybe you can see the connection; I couldn't.