Quote:
Originally Posted by zuluking
|
Watts was never mentioned personally in the article yet he's taking it personally?
Why does he get to do a drive-by on the scientific profession on a regular basis, but if it gets turned around on him it's 'slimy'?
A noted sceptic blog versus one of the world's most respected and more objective papers (being owned by a charitable trust instead of a billionaire with an agenda). Yeaaaahhh.