Quote:
Originally Posted by zuluking
|
What journal was that published in? I'm guessing it wasn't because it's pretty horrible. It's badly written. The figures are badly done - some lack scales, no legends. The conclusions are pretty weak. I can't actually evaluate half the data in it because of a lack of information. Where did the data come from? Some of the references don't exist. Some of the references he uses to support his case are not scientific literature. There is no title. No author. No affiliations. There is curiously no mention of funding source - no acknowledgements. Hmmm...
That's not a believable manuscript. That's not proper science. I'm sorry if you don't believe me, but it really is junk. I could sit here and pull it apart all day if you want, but I don't think you care.