Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
I'm not sure what your point is here; that Iginla was great with a low amount of icetime, and then was never given the opportunity to develop on that success in game 2?
|
My point is why weren't people bitching and whining about his ice time in game 1. If he had 18 minutes like normal he could have had 6 goals!!!
Another poster has already confirmed that 9 minutes in game 1 was unacceptable...
The fact that some posters are crying foul and declaring all those who aren't part of the kill Babcock mob is pretty funny but also quite sad. Attacking other posters because they don't agree with a bunch of ridiculous shiznat like "If we don't get Olympic Gold, it is Babcocks fault for not playing Iggy more" is really sad/funny.
I don't even necessarily agree that Iggy should be on the 4th line, I'm just not prepared to declare all people who even suggest that someone else get top line time is a traitor and an idiot. Frankly I think it is embarrassing that posters might read CP and think all Flames fans are that fickle.
I'm sure we'll all be attacking Canucks fans who cry foul and burn their passport if Lou doesn't get the start tonight. Yet, when it is Iggy, and it is based on less than ONE game (so far) people are ready to declare Babcock a loser and the Olympics a failure? Give me a break.