Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
I think that email gate right now is fairly minor compared to the above posted articles that are coming out.
There is a credibility argument growing
|
What's the credibility issue again? Glaciers were said to melt faster? One prediction in a 2000 page tome is wrong? What about the other 1999 pages, are they now scientifically unsound?
Science is not something that is credible. Either the observations support the conclusion or they do not. Uncredible science is rooted out. The Glaciers is one example. Where are the others?