Quote:
Originally posted by Hakan@Aug 31 2005, 03:27 PM
Quote:
Science only holds itself back. There is no 'evidence' for the big bang... the same evidence can be used for creation.
|
WRONG.
There is substantial evidence for the big bang.
Take your god loving melon out of your god loving ass.
|
And as I said, the SAME evidence can be used for creation. Hmph. A planet forming out of essentially nothing. Cool. There absolutely cannot be a supernatural explaination for it, and yet, we cannot scientifically prove it either! There's 'evidence' of science involved though, so we'll go with that!
Take your intolerant head out of your intolerant ass.
So a scientist can make amino acids in a test tube provided that oxygen is not present. How then can life form if oxygen cannot be present or else there will be no amino acids? Did you question that one?
There's no proof either way, and I'm the first to admit that. There's evidence of evolution, but nothing to say how life started in the first place. That to me is a rather large gap in 'scientific knowledge'. Unlike scientists however, while I am willing to accept that there may be a scientific explaination for the development of the earth, most scientists are unwilling to accept that there may be a supernatural explaination. It's called tolerance.
I am not preaching about creation, I'm just saying there's no proof for the big bang any more than there is for creation. My Christianity has nothing to do with that. I just like to question everything. (And yes, I've questioned the existance of God many times as well. I just prefer to have faith in the afterlife, than have faith in that this is it for us.)