Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan02
I think it's fair to go further and say with certainty that nobody understands climate completely or even close to completely. I take issue in the fact that these scientists want to toss around literally trillions of dollars based on what can at best be described as incomplete science.
|
The tobacco industry considers the cigarette <---> lung cancer science to be incomplete. For the denialists, no amount of science would be sufficient.
But "Flames in 07" makes a point. The question isn't "are we 100% sure there is global warming", but rather "are we so sure that there is not global warming that we are willing to risk the well-being of our children?". Like I said earlier in this thread, it's not going to be my generation that is going to suffer if there is global warming, but rather our children. And I think that sufficient to argue passionately for change.