Quote:
Originally Posted by bcb
I have no problem with parents seeking out choice.
My view is that, with regards to both health care and education, we need a strong public system. If individuals wish to seek out alternative private alternatives, they may opt to do so, provided they pay for it themselves.
I don't think that's such a radical viewpoint.
Keep in mind that in the end, spreading money around won't save money or make the system more efficient.
|
Having the $$$ (already allocated) follow the student (voucher system) does not pay for private schooling. They still have to pay the additional fees.
A voucher system brings in an element of competition. Schools would have to excel to attract the students in order to get funding. I know that sounds a bit scary, but it would actually create a stronger public system.
We would actually see schools start to emerge to address the true needs of students. We would see more Dr. Oakleys (literacy immersion) or James Fowlers (trade development). It would open the door to all sorts of possibilities; arts schools, music, etc.
No, this wouldn't save money (though the potential is there), but it absolutely will make the system more effective and student outcomes would be higher.