View Single Post
Old 01-05-2010, 10:25 PM   #24
NuclearFart
First Line Centre
 
NuclearFart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan View Post
I was under the impression from a US news show with someone from the manufacturer on to do a propaganda piece that these were non-ionizing. They didn't specifically state it, but implied it (Something along the lines of "these are totally safe"). Apparently a pretty big lie. Not cool for pregnant/elderly/sick people who are heavy travelers, or anyone really.
Not sure what you're referring to here, are you talking about the full body scanners that do use x-rays? Even if those were being employed, the radiation dose per use is absolutely negligible compared to background radiation. Some perspective on radiation dose:

1 Full body airport scan = 0.0001 mSv
1 year of living in Calgary = 5 mSv
1 Hour in an airplane = 0.005 mSv

In otherwords, you are getting about 50,000 body scans for each year you live in Calgary, or 50 body scans for each hour in an airplane.
NuclearFart is offline   Reply With Quote