Quote:
Originally posted by Flame On@Aug 23 2005, 06:28 PM
Quote:
Vice-President Jose Vicente Rangel said Venezuela was studying its legal options, adding that how Washington responds to Robertson's comments would put its anti-terrorism policy to the test.
"The ball is in the U.S. court, after this criminal statement by a citizen of that country," Rangel told reporters. "It's huge hypocrisy to maintain this discourse against terrorism and at the same time, in the heart of that country, there are entirely terrorist statements like those."
|
This is fataing classic. Talk about holding their feet to the fire, what're they going to do?
I guess they'll come out with some "our administration does not condone those comments" bs or something. Go against the church or go against terrorism which is it going to be US? lol
|
WTF are you and the Venezuelan VP talking about? The US government doesn't have to have ANY response whatsoever to this statement. Pat Robertson is nobody. He has the right to make such a statement in this country, no matter how loopy it is.
What freaking dilema could the US gov't possibly have here?
Wow.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|