Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowperson
In his latest paper, Lu further proves the cosmic-ray-driven ozone depletion theory by showing a large number of data from laboratory and satellite observations. One reviewer wrote: "These are very strong facts and it appears that they have largely been ignored in the past when modelling the Antarctic ozone loss."
I'm not a conspiracy guy but there is a sizeable difference between "ignoring" and "not knowing."
Cowperson
|
I don't get what you're saying?
Anyways .... Gotta hand it to Lu, he's really sticking his neck out.
He could be a tad more diplomatic (and maybe he's being misquoted) when claiming that:
"My findings do not agree with the climate models that conventionally mainly CO2, are the major culprits for the global warming seen in the late 20th century,"
In his research, Lu discovers that while there was global warming from 1950 to 2000, there has been global cooling since 2002. The cooling trend will continue for the next 50 years, according to his new research observations.
I was under the impression that 2005 was warmer than 2002. Would I be guilty of an accusation of cherry picking when Lu presents cooling since 2002? Goalposts now moved from 1998?
Anyways Lu, it looks like at least has the balls to put his credibility on the line as a young professor which at this stage will get him and his institution multiple media attention and advertisement of his thoughts. He's definitely one of those "where are they now?" characters to be revisited in 10-20 years time.
I've just got problems with the way the thing is written:
In his latest paper, Lu further proves the cosmic-ray-driven ozone depletion theory by showing a large number of data from laboratory and satellite observations. One reviewer wrote: "These are very strong facts and it appears that they have largely been ignored in the past when modelling the Antarctic ozone loss."
I'd take a 50 year bet with Lu.