Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
My definition is more focused on the end result. A country without minorities. The Iranian government has been focused on making the country e with Persian dominance.
Whether they use dramatic acts of violence or a slow and steady campaign to force people out, the end result is the same. The methods may be different, but the end result is no Jews (or in this case, so far only 10% of Jews).
|
If you can stop demonizing all things Muslim for a minute, how about commenting on the ethnic cleansing that occured outside the Middle East?
Do you hold the Baltic States in the same low regard as the Islamic States? I can't say as I've ever seen you post about that, although I could be mistaken. Surely you're aware their treatment of Jews was arguably worse.
BTW, why, in your scenarios, are the individuals who resettled always driven or forced out under threat of violence or persecution? Just maybe some decided to resettle in the Jewish homeland. Silly me, I thought that was at least part of the attraction of establishing Israel.
And finally, nice dodge of all the points raised by octothorp. When the facts get in the way, generalize. If the last 20 years of history (wrt Iranian Jews) is an inconvenient truth ..... ignore it!
Let me try the same strategy. Israeli rockets and Israeli soldiers have killed more Palestinian civilians that Hamas has killed Israeli civilians. Like you,
Quote:
|
My definition is more focussed on the end result.
|
ergo, ipso facto, Israel is more evil than Hamas.
That strawman argument is as legitimate as the one you are making.