Quote:
Originally Posted by zuluking
I would say that the obsession with CO2 is distracting from what should arguably higher profile (and proven) environmental issues. It's not like those went away; they just don't warrant a New World Government redistributing wealth.
|
Examples?
Nice to see HOZ quoting Bjorn Lomborg as "laying it out nicely", and now accepting AGW like Lomborg?
And being a member is not equal to activism. In fact Lomberg flatly states in the quoted interview he wasn't an active member.
I'm just curious why so many people like FOL are getting hysterically over a non legally binding document, that they would feign disgust at Darfur as a reason to argue against the "suggestions".
And .. CO2 aside, how can the meeting be called useless when the important issue of present, planned and future adaptation measures to "
observed happenings" was a siginificant chunk of the meeting.