View Single Post
Old 12-21-2009, 01:27 PM   #1
EddyBeers
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default Dogs twice as bad for environment as SUV's

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/technology/environment/Polluting%20pets%20devastating%20impact%20best%20f riend/2367119/story.html

Quote:
Combine the land required to generate its food and a "medium" sized dog has an annual footprint of 0.84 hectares (2.07 acres) -- around twice the 0.41 hectares required by a 4x4 driving 10,000 kilometres (6,200 miles) a year, including energy to build the car.
But as always, the solution to the problem is not in my backyard

Quote:
Sylvie Comont, proud owner of seven cats and two dogs -- the environmental equivalent of a small fleet of cars -- says defiantly, "Our animals give us so much that I don't feel like a polluter at all.


"I think the love we have for our animals and what they contribute to our lives outweighs the environmental considerations.


"I don't want a life without animals," she told AFP.
EddyBeers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EddyBeers For This Useful Post: