Leaving aside the question of which is better - PC or Mac - I question the selection of an ad campaign that still leaves the market leader with a better than 90% market share and the challenger with less than 10% as worthy of all kinds of praise. Isn't the point of advertising to move units, not impress magazine editors?
Apple is like a luxury brand that doesn't get to charge real luxury prices. What's the point in being Lexus when you're still getting Toyota dollars per unit?
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
|