[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by MarchHare

We're getting a bit off-topic, but I'll answer your question thusly: if you were Darryl Sutter and wanted assistance evaluating talent, are the opinions of each of these three people equally valid: Cowperson, Bicycle Bruce, Tod Button?

That's not a fair comparison.

A hockey player's talent is something that can for the most part be objectively evaluated. Becasue someone is better at recognizing it means that their opinion on the matter is more valuable.

Most people would argue that quality of music (not dificulty, or any of the technical aspects of music) is mostly subjective, so why is anyone's opinion more correct than anothers.

Yes for some people there is often a correlation between the technical aspect of music, and the subjecive quality, but that's a personal taste.