View Single Post
Old 12-16-2009, 10:34 AM   #67
sclitheroe
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
No other commercial aicraft is built using carbon fibre composite molds and as such they will never know for sure how it handles. If you really think that any pilot could use the current 787 "simulator" and fly the plane - well then I guess we will have to agree to disagree.
This is a ridiculous assertion - they knew to a very high degree how it was going to perform before it flew. They knew the physical and aerodynamic properties of the airframe, they knew the weight and balance, thrust, they know where the control surfaces are and how much deflection they have, etc, etc. Flight is basically all about fluid dynamics - its well understood, highly modeled, and we have a century of data to draw upon.

In fact, if they took off yesterday and determined that the plane had significant deviations from expected performance and handling, the entire project would have been deemed a failure. You don't sink billions of dollars in R&D, tooling, and manufacture only to discover that the one flying prototype has nowhere near the performance envelope you projected when you started. Particularly when your engineers have a history of developing numerous other airliners.

If you want to talk about real world reliability, fatigue life, damage resistance, etc, then yes, there is significantly more of an unknown element there - accelerated wear testing will never be as accurate as real world operation. But they knew how the thing would fly.
__________________
-Scott

Last edited by sclitheroe; 12-16-2009 at 10:37 AM.
sclitheroe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sclitheroe For This Useful Post: