Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
This has already been discussed.
No they didn't, 95% of their source data is available online right now, you can download it. The rest isn't available because they aren't allowed to make it available; the licensing of the data required that they use it then discard it.
This also relates to some of the FOI inquiries.. if they are legally not allowed to share the data, of course a FOI inquiry is going to be rejected.
This is what I mean by handwaving. Claims without support, or vague support (posting a billion line text file). |
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6945445.ece
You should just email them and tell them to download it off the internet.
Obviously, you won't accept any "claims." Basically, I need to trust that most of the source data is available on the internet based on your statement (as the raw data from HADCRUT3 is toast, there is no way to prove your claim), but the comments in the source code providing the homogenization of the climate temperature data is too vague (written by an actual UEA developer based on the incoherence of the previous and current source code being relied on to provide these infallible datasets.) Just because you don't understand it or have the patience to evaluate doesn't diminish the efforts of others to do so.
You do realize, by your own definition, that you are "handwaving" at every one of my posts.