Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
Wow Bagor what a great find! A New York Times article saying bad things about the Bush administration. Who would have thunk? I think the only surprising thing is that you had to go back to June 2005 to find it.
So a story written in June 2005 about some government reports that were edited slightly in 2003 by a government employee whose job among other things was to go over and edit said reports is relevant how? You do realize the NYT had received all these intergovernmental memos through the Freedom of information act. They weren't withheld or deleted. None of the information was lost by a convenient accident. That said and with all of these memos open to the Times reporter the worst he could sight specifically was the addition of the adjective "significant" or "fundamental" before the word uncertainties. I'm amazed the Democrats didn't call for congressional hearings.  |
Thanks, I thought so too.
Great example of how the government was is big oils pocket and was misrepresenting their own scientist's findings I'd say.
And suddenly "significant" or "fundamental" have no significance to the interpretation of findings but "trick" is the mother of all global conspiracies.
