Quote:
Originally Posted by Nage Waza
What are you talking about? There is no expert that said it was the knife. I think you are confused. They found her DNA on a knife along with his. They probably tested every knife in the house for that combo, and found one. They claimed it 'could' be the knife, they never said it was the knife.
The truth is that someone broke in a window and likely used that or some smaller type of blade to kill her.
Plus, the so called expert that testified for the prosecution works for the prosecution, this was not some independent analysis completed.
|
and the so called expert who testified for the defense was paid to do so by the defense. And if that one didn't agree they wouldn't have put that person on the stand.
You can argue that both ways.
The fact is that no one outside of the actual murderer or murderers knows whether or not Amanda Knox is guilty. Neither side can say with 100% certainty that they know. She doesn't have an alibi, and there is no proof she didnt do it.
I have all ready said I wouldn't convict her based on the evidence, I just thought she was guilty.
You arguing on the knife not being the murder weapon is like saying the glove didn't fit OJ so he is rightly innocent. The two don't have to be tied.