Quote:
Originally Posted by Nage Waza
What is your gut feeling based on? I have seen no evidence against her. A murder scene with some sort of sexual ritual would have left more than the one guy's DNA. Her DNA was not on any of the evidence, except for a kitchen knife from her own kitchen. The knife was also not used in the crime.
With no evidence, no motive and nothing else attaching her to the crime, there is no case. This girl was BASHED in the media.
I don't care what someone on BBC or CNN said; this is a non case and she basically got slammed in Italy.
|
My gut feeling on this is based around the fact that in the days after the murder she acted like a murderer, lying to the police, pushing someone else for the killing, and then using the excuse of "I dont remember what happened"
She can say that the police hit her and forced her to write down that statement, I choose not to believe her based on her actions after her supposed friend was killed.
To say it is a non-case is wrong, people go to court on circumstantial evidence here all the time. And her DNA was on the murder weapon whether they could double blind test it or not. And she put herself at the scene of the murder in her first "alibi"
As I said it is not enough to convict and I wouldn't be able to say guilty, but it is enough for me to think she did it.
Only reason this case is getting a lot of media play over here and there is an uproar in the american media, even when legal experts have said there was enough for this to go to trial and maybe get a conviction, is because its a pretty young girl.