Quote:
Originally Posted by diane_phaneuf
she changed her alibi, in English mind you no language barrier there, twice. Doesn't exactly scream of innocence
the media no doubt didn't treat this case as we are used to in North America, but she dug this hole for herself by lying at the start of the case
I said that she didn't get a fair trial, I personally think she is guilty but based on the evidence no one could say that beyond a reasonable doubt she was the killer.
|
Seems like you've been following the case more closely than me, so tell me if I'm wrong, but I thought her confessional statement was the product of 14 hours of uninterrupted interrogation, without a lawyer. That alone should raise suspicion as to its reliability.
Further, it seems like much of the prosecution's case was built on Knox's post-offence conduct: being with her boyfriend buying lingerie, public socializing, etc. But I fail to see how that is evidence of guilt.
On the other hand, I don't see why the police would unfairly target her. I mean, an expedient resolution was already reached in convicting the other guy, who was shown to have been a thief in that area.
Who knows? This is such a strange case, so much of which hinges on two completely distinct versions of the accused.