Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12
Call me convinced that something a tad fishy is going on. The tools of science can never overcome the pitfalls of the human ego.
|
A tad fishy? Probably.
A global conspiracy of thousands of scientists? What's your thoughts on that?
And why don't people come up with a credible alternative hypothesis or at least something that supports the null hypothesis?
Why aren't M&M off collecting their own data, doing their own analysis to forge credible criticism of the hypothesis.
Why isn't Plimer doing analysis instead of running around reproducing fraudulent graphs and coming out with ridiculous statements that serve no good at all except for entertainment factor when the likes of HOZ reproduces them as fact?
It's like politics at election time. No spin on the positive that they're going to do as instead of presenting their own case they attack the opposition in the hope people don't notice that they themselves have got nothing.
Now ... as has been mention loads and loads of times in this thread there is tonnes of data freely available for download.
If you're on the fence on the subject I'd suggest this.
Given all the data available, wait 3-4 years to see if a "decent" refutation of the hypothesis presents itself. More than enough time for a thorough analysis.
If nothing appears then start seriously questioning if they have anything at all?