Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
One more try Bagor.
|
Impatient sort of fella aren't you?
Now my turn.
This thread is about potential fraudulent behaviour as suggested to you.
Now .... Convince me you're not a hypocrite. Answer my question.
My question simply is this:
Were you (a) blatantly posting stuff that you knew to be completely ridiculous and false or (b) are did you post it with honest intentions but were so gullible that you actually believed it was true and would hold strength as an argument?
Which one is it (a) or (b)?
It's a fair question for the purposes of the debate moving forward. I think it's only fair that I know whether I'm dealing with a blatant liar (a) or a gullible individual (b). Wouldn't you agree?
I'll even give you a get out clause of (c) my bad, how the hell could anyone have believed that?
Prove to me you're in here for a serious discussion and are not a stereotypical denier.
Quote:
|
Creationists and climate change deniers have this in common: they don't answer their critics. They make what they say are definitive refutations of the science. When these refutations are shown to be nonsense, they do not seek to defend them. They simply switch to another line of attack. They never retract, never apologise, never explain, just raise the volume, keep moving and hope that people won't notice the trail of broken claims in their wake.
|
Is it (a) HOZ? Is it (b) orrrrrrr will you grab the (c)?
Answer the question and we'll move on or I can guarantee you the bolded above won't happen.