Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
Insults, condescension, demonization, and the like.
If you want more on the X1000 CO2 levels in the past go check out the scientist that said that. The link is there.
|
LOL! Stop playing the victim.
YOU are the one that posted it and as such are responsible for it.
YOU used it to argue a point.
The "scientist" has already been checked out and exposed for the complete fraud he is in my post a few pages back. Were you aware that he was a complete fraud?
Now stop trying to disown that
YOU posted the quote. My question simply is this:
Were you (a) blatantly posting stuff that you knew to be completely ridiculous and false or (b) are did you post it with honest intentions but wereso gullible that you actually believed it was true and would hold strength as an argument?
Which one is it (a) or (b)?
It's simple.
YOU'RE the one talking about fraud and misleading people yet when you're called out on posting blatantly fraudulent rubbish all I'm hearing is waa waa I'm being insulted, condescended and demonized. If you're going to argue a point either back it up or concede that you were duped into tying rubbish.
Less deflection and answer the question ............... please. (a) or (b)?