Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
That data from the CRU has shown that Phil Jones(about to be investigated) and Michael Mann(under investigation) and those that work for them have, at best, been very incompetent, dishonest and unethical. At worst, they have committed fraud, fixed data to torque the results to get huge grants (95 billion!). When you lose Monbiot as a booster for the 2 biggest proponents of the AGW theory.....and saying what I have just typed. What do you have left?
|
That you have judged them guilty before the investigation has even been started shows your bias.
Rather than innocent until proven guilty, you're just thrilled that it appears to you that there's something to support your pre-conceived bias.
For a third time you can throw everything from this university out and the consensus would remain the same.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
AGW theory has to be considered very suspect. Until more and better evidence is presented showing something to the contrary, the Earth has warmed due to natural phenomena and committing trillions to to combating AGW is idiotic.
|
So you accept the planet is warming now? I thought you were just discounting all the science?
The melting glaciers and moving crops and migrating animals and humans who have evolved in a 2 degree range don't care if the warming is due to people or not, the end result is still the same.
CO2 is a greenhouse gas, it's why the earth isn't a frozen ball devoid of most life. There's more CO2 in the atmosphere now than there was for the last million years or more. That CO2 has been proven to be from fossil fuels with isotope ratio analysis.