Quote:
Originally Posted by MelBridgeman
Personally, I thought that movie was stupid and a complete waste of time with no valid point. Doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure out that if all you ate was fast food for a month, it would not be good...
Mcdonalds gets a bad "wrap", the next movie should be eating anything at Starbucks for a month...I am sure that will do way worst things to you.
|
I always thought from a scientific method point of view, of from the point of view of trying to prove anything that the methods were terribly flawed, and I think McDonalds was wise to avoid giving this guy a final interview.
Basically he went right from being a generally healthy long term vegetarian to slamming massive quantities of greasy meat into his system, and selecting the least healthiest food items into his system three times a day.
frankly a vietnam era pow camp cook had a better sense of nutrition then this guy did.
Of course he's going to get sick and his liver function for example is going to go off of the chart.
If at the same time that he did his experiment he had a average guy with an average american diet participate in the experiment we would have probably seen a slower decline in vitals by the average male.
would eating super sized grease burgers and super sized fries and super sized suger drinks three times a day for thirty days be detrimental to my health? Well duh, but thats not a statement of how bad McDonalds food is for you, its a testiment of somebody not having common sense, or wanting to kill themselves gruesomely.
I thought the movie was entertaining as hell, by I enjoyed his other movie "Where in the world is Osama Bin Laden much much more"