Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji
I am not debating this with you. I think I more or less agree with your viewpoint, but sometimes I am not sure because what you are saying doesn't make sense.
I am simply pointing out that if you can't be bothered to create what most of the English speaking world calls a sentence, perhaps people won't be taking your scientific insights in the serious manner you think they deserve.
I do wonder, since you claim to be passionate about this subject, where your opinion stems from. Most of the websites posted that support your position in this thread are hardly what most people would refer to as credible.
|
honestly a few years ago i downloaded 2 movies to watch when i was bored; an inconvenient truth, and, the great global warming swindel. i really liked al gores movie, then, i watched the great global warming swindle (coming into it with a very skeptical mind) and was blown away. it was very convincing because it presented data, graphs, scientists and professors, while truth was a politician selling a point of a view like a politician. after that i did some online reading and i was pretty much sold. this last summer a friend of mine who has a math degree from u of c and now is in UBC law got annoyed with all my chirping and we spent an hour googling data from the last 150 years people have put into graphs and reports etc. he was a staunch climate change guy, i mean hard core. in 60 mins he went from being hard core "this is our problem we made it happen" to "well maybe we didn't cause it but perhaps our co2 is not letting it slow down like it should be". not exactly a huge turn around but when people take the time look at the graphs, data, read about the hockey stick graph, its really hard to say that people are solely to blame (if it all).
and thats really what im driving at here... humans really didnt cause this last warming, imo.