[zuluking]

Originally Posted by Devils'Advocate

(A) Those were not "facts" any more than this page is full of "facts":
http://www.allaboutcreation.org/evid...lution-faq.htm
(B) I don't debate people who call people names. I don't like name calling of anyone of any political stripe.

But if global warming has been so disproved, why do NASA, National Geographic, Science Magazine, not taken down their links?

NASA -
http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/global...worldbook.html

National Geographic -
http://environment.nationalgeographi...-overview.html

Science Magazine
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/conten.../306/5702/1686

I just don't think that John Daly stands up to the National Academy of Science.

http://dels.nas.edu/climatechange/

I think there is far more science on the global warming side than against. And I would have posted that save for not wanting to debate people that resort to insulting those on the other side of the debate.

NASA has alot of skin in the game. Can't speak to the others, but NASA in particular has made alot of statements and their credibility in this particular area is on the line. They'll wait until they have a credible exit strategy, but exit the ultimately will. Proclamations are easy; disclaimers not so much.