Quote:
Originally Posted by Nage Waza
You have not been paraphrasing, you have been inventing things you somehow hoped I would say. I have nothing to clarify since I said nothing that you put in quotation marks. The fact you are standing up for yourself here rather than saying you misread or may have been off base is a sign of being a complete dishonest sucker. Look at any of your posts where you have used quotation marks and quote yourself and clear the air that you made a mistake. Be a man and do the right thing.
|
You know what... we're not going to see eye to eye on this one so there's really no point in continuing. How I paraphrased you is basically what your point boils down to to someone else reading your post. Don't like it? That's not what you were trying to say? Fine - but that's what it reads as. If you want to clear up your position, that's great. If not, quit being so butt hurt about it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nage Waza
You clearly are naive and have no idea what you are talking about. Prisoners of war are taken all the time and tortured. I think that is something that should be done if it means saving lives. I am sure it has worked and on some it has not worked on others. I am fine with those stats. I am not sure what this thread was started about (that was many posts ago), but I do know that you jumped all over me because I think torture has it's place in interrogation.
|
Yes, currently, prisoners of war are being taken and tortured; I'm not naive about that fact. This is wrong and should be stopped. That's the entire god damn point.
The American government has always been against torture till now. Back in WWII the Americans said waterboarding was torture, was a war crime and deserved to be punished with 15 years hard labour. Fast forward a couple decades and now its them doing the torturing and everything's a-ok. It's not a war crime, its not even torture according to some and its all excusable cause they're just trying to stop those evil terrists.