Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
I'm no expert here, but I was thinking that the hiring coupled with the use of the hirer's car could be construed as an employment relationship as well as a short term lease of the vehicle to the hired party. Consideration wouldn't be an issue, the simple act of relinquishing use of the vehicle for 4 hours is sufficient to constitute consideration.
It's a pretty weak argument, at least on what we have here, but I always found that stuff like that jumped me up a letter grade on my exams.
Sorry for turning your party into a law school exam JohnnyTitan  |
Fair enough I see what you're saying. And thanks for not thinking my responce was snarky, I didn't intent it to be, but alas this
is the internet.
My only question would be, if you have an employement contract (which I agree with you on no doubt) would the car really be leased to the employee? I'm just thinking that if I have a company car, is the car leased to me, or to the company that I'm using as an agent of the company? (Again, I don't know the actual legal answer to this). I just think it's too much of a stretch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
Well it's a bit of a stretch, but as you probably know by now law school exams always have these stupid little things thrown in that you're expected to do something with.
|
Actually I don't know what law school exams are like (semester 1, year 1) so I'm just finding out, litterally right now. Good idea thinking of the stretch arguments to throw in as a side. I'll be sure to try and do that myself.
Back to the issue at hand, JohnnyTitan I guess we're saying it's fine, we think. I personally don't mean to be a party pooper, just like the debate that got started.
The real question we should be asking here is what kind of alcohol will be provided? Is there going to be enough Rum, Vodka and Tequila for all? Will there be pictures that end up on Break.com?