Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
So? None of this does anything to establish that a) squalene is harmful and b) that the vaccinations are harmful.
|
Maybe you're not following me, but I never said that vaccines ARE definitely harmful. I am just saying that there is enough reason to believe that a rushed and poorly tested vaccine COULD be harmful and therefore people are perfectly within their right to not get vaccinated and don't deserve to be called names and what not.
Quote:
|
All this proves is that someone decision maker in the German government decided to get a different one for government employees. You're "there is a reason" is true, but you haven't shown what that reason is or that it's a good reason. Some random bureaucrat probably read that the vaccine with the adjuvant in it caused more sorness, headache, and fever and decided the lost hours for the government staff due to reactions was worth getting the non-adjuvant version. Maybe the non-adjuvant version costs a lot more?
|
It means the people making the decision thought it was a better option in light of the evidence they had. You know, the debate about adjuvants isn't new and didn't just start now. I'd be surprised if the politicians decision had nothing to do with with the unknown surrounding them with this particular vaccine.