Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
I would hardly call a seat of the pants judgment (that injecting less is better for you than injecting more) based on no information an instinct. Medical care hasn't been around long enough for evolution to make it part of our instincts.
|
I would call it instinct. A species without the ability to sense danger of ingesting something unknown probably wouldn't last long. It should be fairly obvious that it's not a wise thing to do.
Quote:
This makes no sense.. how do past incidents have anything to do with the test results of the current situation?
How is "Current tests with H1N1 vaccines show x y and z oh but keep in mind that 30 years ago there was a vaccine that had some problems!" in any way meaningful? That's just an appeal to emotion to try and scare someone.
Don't buy a car today because GM built some cars where they burst into flame makes about as much sense.
|
I don't see how that doesn't make sense. If something was botched before and now we have incomplete information and are testing it with lowered standards than usual, I think people should be a little worried. I know if or when I get the shot, I'll be monitoring my health a little more closely.