Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
I did see that, the study linked is the one that has technical deficiencies as another published paper describes (I can't figure out which one without reading all the papers, which I am not doing right now).
There was a possible contamination in the order of 1 millionth the amount of squalene in the anthrax vaccine compared to an actual use of squalene in the 20+ million doses of vaccine used in Europe. The measured contamination is on the order of 1/10th the concentration of squalene naturally found in a normal person's blood, produced naturally by the liver.
I mean you can buy squalene in heath food stores in far higher concentrations.
So I still don't see the established risk of squalene.
|
You can buy a lot of things at health stores that I wouldn't necessarily want to inject into my bloodstream.
The human body is extremely sensitive to some changes in chemistry. Just because a background level of something exists, it does not mean that it is ok to raise it by any amount.