[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by T@T

Why wouldn't you debate all his points?


Disagree, I have yet to see anyone disprove any statement I could make disproving a christian/religious god. The thumpers jump in with a statement and never back it up. They run away like little kids caught in a lie.

I'm more than ready if anyone wants a debate.

I won't debate his other statements because in the context of his post they are perfectly logical points to make.
The problem I had with his other statement was that it's an example of using semantics to debate theology, which is completely self defeating.

To your second point, you completely missed my point. Debating the sematics of "Monotheism" is akin to creationists debating what "Theory" means as if it somehow discredits evolution. If you're debating the exact meaning of a word that you've arbitrarily applied to your opponents position, it's an inherently weak argument.

Now, would it be rude if I pointed out that you come across as being so intent on getting into an anti-religion debate with a "Thumper", that you can't even recognize when someone is pointing out that most of their arguments are logical fallacies? I mean the whole point of my argument was that these sorts of arguments don't prove anything, and you reply with "I disagree, no one has ever proved me wrong"...really...