Quote:
Originally Posted by Drury18
Okay, so if I connect the dots from Reply 1 to Reply 2, I believe you actually help my case. If not completely prove it. They realistically have evidence of it being unsafe and yet the rest of the population would rather sit around with fingers in their ears singing and refusing to look into it.
|
Which evidence? If there was clear evidence that it was unsafe then it would be pulled, and I would of course support that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drury18
No one wants to look into it because it doesn't support the general thoughts of the here and now, therefore its wrong. Or because there is belief we have to act fast or else? Or else what? If these people are right, you just incited mass panic.
|
What??? You do realize that when they do things like this, make a vaccine and test it, that the results are public right? Science is done in an open venue so other scientists can check, confirm, or refute the claims.
What you are saying here is that all the scientists are what, being coerced into not looking into it? Conspiracy theory much?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drury18
And if we can get a flu vaccine so quick, how come cancer and other diseases that have been around much longer are still an issue? 10+ years to work on a lung cancer drug but what 6 months for a flu vaccine for a brand new, super dangerous flu? BS. Total BS. This alone shows how untested and unresearched this thing is.
|
Wow. This statement alone demonstrates you are completely unqualified to make any judgment with respect to the efficacy and merits of any kind of medical technology.
Seriously, please just ask your doctor's opinion and go with that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drury18
And don't even hand me that media attention stuff. Really, whose playing the better game. The doom and gloomers or the naysayers. Judging by several media outlets, its easily 10-1 doom and gloomers. No one wants to hear from anyone saying anything outside of get your shot to stay alive.
|
Who exactly is predicting doom and gloom?
The WHO isn't out there leveraging the media to get an unsubstantiated point across.
The media are what they are, they're going to find anything sensational and beat the hell out of it. It is what it is.
My point was "scientists" who can't get any attention through normal scientific processes so resort to media. "Pseudo-scientists".