Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
The best science we have to date says the vaccine is not harmful. A bunch of psuedo-scientists say it is harmful. That's what this really seems to boil down to for me.
|
They said that in '78 too. And while you can say that we've made progress in 30 years, plently of mistakes are still being made.
And basing your decision on what "scientists" say as opposed to "psuedo-scientists" to me seems foolish. Is anyone arguing against the vaccine automatically in the psuedo group for you because their opinions are different and what you choose not to hear? Are you not open to hearing both sides of the debate in a unbiased manner in order to make the best decision?
I throw this out there because how many times in history has a "pseudo-scientiest" been proven correct and brilliant when balked at by their peers?