Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagor
You know what's disturbing about you CB is that you constantly throw out tripe as if it was unquestionable fact. Again and again in many different threads you do this without providing links/studies/evidence and I can only conclude that you are knowingly, sinfully lying to promote your own personal agenda. When challenged you then proceed to avoid answering direct questions, which I've no doubt you will now.
Of course you can prove me wrong by pointing me to a "scientific" (not some mumbo jumbo rant) that backs up your point.
Here's a conclusion of a literature review of what you just claimed.
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbo...lestation.html |
This thread has been all about attacking the Catholic church for their actions and lack of action regarding pedophilia within the ranks of their clergy. It has been suggested that the practice of celibacy contributes to the occurrences of sexual assaults on children. It has been suggested that pedophilia is more common within the Catholic clergy than without. It has been suggested that the church has been more likely to cover such acts up than the rest of society and is still actively doing so. Yet for none of these assertions did you call them out for lack of proof. Where is the call for scientific studies from them? How hypocritical of you!
I base my claim that homosexuals have a higher percentage of pedophiles in their ranks on simple math. I've never heard a creditable source that puts the number of homosexuals within society at higher than 7%. Yet the occurrence of same sex pedophile cases appear to be quit high. That suggests more pedophiles per capital and/or more active pedophiles within the homosexual community. I categorically reject the notion that a man who is having oral or anal sex with a boy is not a homosexual because of the age of his partner. If you are having sex with someone of the same sex regardless of their age you are committing a homosexual act and are by definition a homosexual.
Your Dr Gregory Herek obviously disagrees with me but then it would be in his best interest to muddy the waters. He is a career lobbyist for homosexual causes. Everything from same sex marriage to sexual orientation discrimination laws, he has been right on the front lines. He even worked for the Clinton administration as a liaison to the homosexual community. He is hardly an unbiased observer.