Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
This frackin thing should have gone to trial, first and foremost the Crown didn't feel it was negligence causing death, they're not obligated to accept a plea bargin for a lesser charge.
Plus with this god damn puss judge, chances are that the scumbag would have gotten an even more wuss slap on the wrist if they would have accepted the plea bargin. Maybe a nice cushy house arrest, or maybe even better a $500.00 fine because he's a sad individual and its really not his fault that he got pissed up and killed a family.
To me the family probably suffered less pain and were probably happier that this went to trial and the Crown fought for the more significant charges.
The Judge is a ###### bag for putting his opinion about the families suffering, he doesn't know crap, he's a soft shoed garbage judge and the world would be better if he was maybe working small claims court instead of criminal court.
|
Wow, you may want to calm down. Talk about going overboard.
Do you understand how a plea bargain works? If the Crown accepted a plea the sentence would be stipulated to. The Court doesn't have to accept it, but imposing a lesser sentence is virtually unheard of.
The crown probably thought they could get a stronger sentence through trial, they were wrong. What the judge said is completely accurate, it was up to the Crown to decide whether this case went to trial.