Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
Sorry, but the Crown could have got the same result without going to trial. The Judges statement is bang on, it was the Crowns decision to go forward with the expense and burden of a trial. I don't think it was a terrible decision, they couldn't see the end result when the decision was made, but it does rest with them.
|
This frackin thing should have gone to trial, first and foremost the Crown didn't feel it was negligence causing death, they're not obligated to accept a plea bargin for a lesser charge.
Plus with this god damn puss judge, chances are that the scumbag would have gotten an even more wuss slap on the wrist if they would have accepted the plea bargin. Maybe a nice cushy house arrest, or maybe even better a $500.00 fine because he's a sad individual and its really not his fault that he got pissed up and killed a family.
To me the family probably suffered less pain and were probably happier that this went to trial and the Crown fought for the more significant charges.
The Judge is a ###### bag for putting his opinion about the families suffering, he doesn't know crap, he's a soft shoed garbage judge and the world would be better if he was maybe working small claims court instead of criminal court.