Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goon
Wow. Knowing virtually nothing of his platform (or his opponent's), I would refrain from supporting him simply due to these actions. I'd also surmise he had a hand in his old lady's letter as well.
|
Not only that in the rebuttal article he reaffirmed the reason why Danielle Smith's Libertarian talking points are gaining traction. He's a social conservative. If you don't want a party run by a social conservative then vote for Danielle Smith.
He makes fun of Danielle Smith's stances as 'PC lite' like it should be a negative thing from where he stands. The only reason why people care to look at the WRA is because they liked the PCs circa 1993 & 1997, don't like what became of them and now want an alternative that either moves the PC's back to the the right to stave off the WRA or actually forms government and governs from that stance. He's suggesting that even the PC's in the 90s need to be moved further right. I think I speak for many Albertans when I say "DO NOT WANT."