Many people seem to think it's virtuous to "Contain Lies" or to "Limit the Stupid (people)", when real virtue is to do neither. Containing and limiting are other ways of saying controlling. We know through experience that controlling thoughts and ideas is counterproductive, and often leads to very bad things. It is far better for you and everyone around you to spread truth and increase intelligence than to try to stop people from thinking things you disagree with. They may not immediately agree with you, but they don't resent you the same way they would if you tried to "stop" them instead.
I find it highly ironic that this is the route that Kirk Cameron is trying to go - and that this is somehow seen as bad by some people. I think it's a real positive on his part that he is approaching this issue in this manner, instead of in the manner that many appear to be advocating to try to "stop" him. I disagree with his stance on evolution, and disagree with what he is likely writing in the preface to the book, but the manner in which he is doing his arguing is actually fairly admirable, once you get past the idea you can't force people to agree with you.
You can't force people to agree with you. If you think that's a good idea, think about what happens if someone you disagree with forced you to agree with him.
There are other ways of responding to someone you disagree with. If you can't think of any, then perhaps you're not qualified to "Limit the stupid", as you should be your own first target.
|