Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
Universal, single-payer health care is more efficient. I await actual evidence to the contrary.
|
Wait, you're saying I have to provide evidence to prove what you said wrong?
Ball is in your court.
My evidence that the two-tiered system works BETTER is based on the findings by the WHO.
I give them the benefit of the doubt that they calculated certain aspects of efficiency as well. Because like I said, which you ignored, a health care system that isn't efficient would in the end be unsatisfactory to the people, and part of the way the WHO measured the results was in how satisfied the people were with their health care.
I also find it quite comical how you initially disputed the list, in fact you said you don't accept it, and then when you look pretty stupid for having done so, you start whining about efficiency because the WHO never mentions it specifically in their report.
If you actually want to say that just because France has the best health care system in the world it doesn't necessarily mean its an efficient system, well there is no further point in arguing with you.
My point, from the START has been that if 7 out of the top 10 countries are using a two-tiered system it would be STUPID of us to ignore that and continue whining that two-tiered health care sucks because I lived in the US for X amount of time and their health care sucks.
I don't think I need to tell you how stupid that argument is.
Two-tiered health care works BETTER. The WHO PROVES that. And if there is a problem with efficiency in a certain country, then you look somewhere else where they DO have an efficient system and try to incorporate parts of their system into ours.