Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T
Or maybe even the 6.8 richter scale earthquake size rumble that happened twice right next to it. 
I thought I trusted the human brain for rationalization but seeing how some people actually believe this crap I've lost all hope.  |
I was thinking about how much of a destabilizing factor the first tower coming down was. Maybe in a vacuum the second tower doesn't collapse, but there were too many event happening at the same time for the collapses not to happen.
When you calculate to prevent a catastrophic failure you might only take one or two events into consideration, and you hope they don't happen at the same time.
Building design + jet airplane impact + thousands of pounds of flaming jet fluid + seismic activity from collapsing building = mass destruction.